Claude Opus 4 Sets a New AI Benchmark in 2025
Anthropic has just unveiled Claude Opus 4, and it’s already leading the pack in the world of AI performance. Backed by real benchmarks, Opus 4 delivers unmatched capabilities in coding, reasoning, math, tool use, and multilingual Q&A.
Compared to top models like GPT-4.1, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and OpenAI o3, Opus 4 shines:
Best in agentic coding (72.5% / 79.4%) — solving real-world code issues faster and more accurately
Top math performer on AIME 2025 (75.5% / 90%)
Leading multilingual understanding (88.8% on MMLU)
Strong in tool use (Retail: 81.4%) and graduate-level reasoning (83.3%)
Its sibling, Claude Sonnet 4, also brings major gains over Sonnet 3.7, especially in precision coding and airline workflow handling.
Why it matters: If you rely on AI for building, analyzing, or automating — Claude Opus 4 is now the gold standard.
Claude Opus 4 vs Top AI Models – Performance Benchmarks
Benchmark | Claude Opus 4 | Claude Sonnet 4 | Claude Sonnet 3.7 | OpenAI o3 | GPT-4.1 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agentic Coding Performance on real-world code fixes using agent tools (SWE-bench).
|
72.5% / 79.4% | 72.7% / 80.2% | 62.3% / 70.3% | 69.1% | 54.6% | 63.2% |
Agentic Terminal Coding Solving code problems using terminal-like environments (Terminal-bench).
|
43.2% / 50.0% | 35.5% / 41.3% | 35.2% | 30.2% | 30.3% | 25.3% |
Graduate-level Reasoning Performance on hard academic questions (GPQA Diamond).
|
79.6% / 83.3% | 75.4% / 83.8% | 78.2% | 83.3% | 66.3% | 83.0% |
Agentic Tool Use How well the AI uses tools like browsers or APIs in retail and airline settings.
|
81.4% / 59.6% | 80.5% / 60.0% | 81.2% / 58.4% | 70.4% / 52.0% | 68.0% / 49.4% | — |
Multilingual Q&A Ability to answer questions in multiple languages (MMLU v3).
|
88.8% | 86.5% | 85.9% | 88.8% | 83.7% | — |
Visual Reasoning Understanding and answering questions based on visual input (MMMU).
|
76.5% | 74.4% | 75.0% | 82.9% | 74.8% | 79.6% |
High School Math Competition Math problem-solving at AIME 2025 level difficulty.
|
75.5% / 90.0% | 70.5% / 85.0% | 54.8% | 88.9% | — | 83.0% |